Together with IBIS it allows to shoot 1/4th of a second at 105mm with quite consistently sharp results. - RF has way faster AF. - both IS and AF are much quieter with RF. - EF feels more rigid thanks to its metal body. - EF suffers from the barrel wobble at 24mm. No impact on IQ, it is just the feel.
Compare Canon RF 24-105mm f 4 L IS USM Lens vs Canon RF-S 18-150mm f 3.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Press ↵ Enter for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ↵ Enter for Keyboard NavigationNEW: Canon LH E1 for mounting the RF 24-105/2.8 in a rig, also at Adorama. NEW: Canon PZ E2 Camera-Powered Power Zoom Adapter for RF 24-105mm f/2.8 , also at Adorama . NEW: Canon PZ E2B Camera-Powered Power Zoom Adapter with 20-pin remote port .
I bought an R with the RF 24-105 L about 3 years ago, and I added the 24-105 RF STM a year ago for ease of carrying. The RF L lens is clearly the best, as it should be, given the price. But there's very little in it between the STM and the EF L - optical performance is remarkably similar - weakest at 24mm, otherwise pretty decent.The 24-105mm focal length range almost seems to be the default for Canon standard zoom lenses and there are already two in the RF system, the RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM and the entry-level 24-105mm
The 14-35mm f/4L is a surprisingly compact and lightweight lens, being even lighter and smaller than the already fairly compact RF 24-105mm f/4L. It has a standard front element that takes front-mounting 77mm filters, and it sacrifices nothing on the long end of the zoom range, going all the way from 14mm ultra-wide angle to 35mm.
This is review of the Canon RF 24-105mm f4 L lens for photographers.Canon R Is the Canon RF 24-105mm f4 L worth it for photography? Should you buy this lens? This is review of the Canon RF 24
The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM is the first super-telephoto zoom lens for EOS R-system mirrorless cameras. It goes without saying this is a high-quality lens with its L-series build, and even has a heat shield coating for coping with shooting in challenging weather conditions, whether it’s hot or cold.
Having f/2.8 in stead of f/4.0 at typical portrait focal lengths is huge. It is, and having 105mm instead of 70mm is also a godsend - at least for my needs. If I had the 24-70/2.8 + 70-200/2.8 combo I would indeed still plan on upgrading to the 24-105/2.8 even though there would be overlap, as it would still save on lens changes and/or body swaps. hgrWh.